Bridge BTC with wrapped, native and BTCFi routes

RenBridge is a reference hub for comparing wrapped Bitcoin, sidechain BTC and BTCFi assets before you move value off Bitcoin L1. Review WBTC, cbBTC, tBTC, BTC.b, RBTC, L-BTC and staking-linked BTC variants across Ethereum, Base, Solana, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Stacks, Rootstock and Liquid, while the old RenVM renBTC route is sunset.

The widget is illustrative only; there is no wallet connection here.

Bridge BitcoinAny chain
You bridge1.00
BTC logoBTC
You receive~1.00
WBTC logoWBTC
Compare BTC bridges

The widget is illustrative only; there is no wallet connection here.

What is a BTC bridge?

Wrapped or bridged BTC is Bitcoin value represented on another chain, not native BTC on Bitcoin L1. A bridge, custodian, federation, vault system or signer set locks or accounts for BTC, then issues a token for a destination chain. That means "BTC" on Ethereum, Base, Solana or another network is really an issuer plus a chain plus a contract. Wrapped Bitcoin is one active model; renBTC is historical.

How bridging BTC works

Most BTC bridge flows start with native BTC or an existing wrapped BTC position, then route through the issuer, bridge or protocol that supports the destination chain. The important question is who controls redemption back to Bitcoin.

  1. Choose your BTC sourceStart with native BTC, WBTC, cbBTC, BTC.b or another supported asset, and confirm whether the route expects Bitcoin L1 funds or an already wrapped token.
  2. Pick destination chain & variantMatch the token to the chain you need: WBTC or tBTC on Ethereum and L2s, cbBTC on Base and supported networks, BTC.b on Avalanche, sBTC on Stacks, RBTC on Rootstock or L-BTC on Liquid.
  3. Lock or custody, then mintThe system may custody BTC, use a federation, coordinate a threshold signing group, rely on DLC escrow, operate collateralized vaults or accept wrapped BTC into a BTCFi protocol before issuing the destination asset.
  4. Redeem back to native BTCTo exit, follow the issuer or protocol redemption path, account for Bitcoin confirmation timing, destination-chain finality and any contract, merchant or account requirements.

Lock-and-mint vs burn-and-release

Bridge-style systems usually lock or custody BTC before minting a representation on another chain, then burn or redeem that representation before releasing BTC back. The tBTC documentation describes a threshold-network model for this kind of Bitcoin bridge flow.

Custody models compared

Wrapped Bitcoin routes differ by control model: a custodian for WBTC or cbBTC, a federation for Liquid and Rootstock-style pegs, TSS/MPC for FBTC-style custody, DLC escrow for dlcBTC/iBTC, collateralized vaults for interBTC and signer-set pegs for sBTC. Interlay is the factpack example of a collateralized vault design.

Confirmations & redemption timing

Timing depends on Bitcoin confirmations, destination-chain settlement and the issuer or protocol's redemption workflow. Avoid assuming a fixed settlement window: BTC.b documentation, for example, frames bridge movement around confirmation and redemption mechanics rather than a universal clock. See BTC.b technical specifications.

Bridge Wrapped BTC (custodial)

Custodian-backed wrapped Bitcoin with the deepest DeFi support. A named issuer holds the BTC and mints the token; access and redemption follow that issuer's rails.

cbBTC logo

Bridge cbBTC

Coinbase · Custodial

Coinbase holds native BTC and issues cbBTC for Base, Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum access.

Bridge BTC
BTCB logo

Bridge BTCB

Binance · Custodial

BTCB is Binance-Peg Bitcoin for BNB Chain, with Binance custody behind the BTC reserve.

Bridge BTC
BTC.b logo

Bridge BTC.b

Lombard · Consortium

BTC.b is Lombard-operated bridged Bitcoin rooted in Avalanche infrastructure. Native BTC backing sits under a consortium, proof, timelock and approval design. It now extends to Ethereum and Katana, so users should confirm the exact network and redemption route before moving funds, including supported contracts, issuer approvals and destination-chain liquidity first.

Bridge BTC
FBTC logo

Bridge FBTC

Function · MPC/TSS

FBTC uses Function's MPC/TSS custody design to represent BTC across Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle and Sonic.

Bridge BTC
21BTC logo

Bridge 21BTC

21.co · Custodial

21.co issues 21BTC against BTC reserves, with Chainlink Proof of Reserve used for transparency. It is available on Solana and Ethereum, so the issuer and contract matter as much as the chain.

Bridge BTC
kBTC logo

Bridge kBTC

Kraken · Custodial

Kraken custodies one native BTC for each kBTC and supports wrapped Bitcoin use on Ethereum and Optimism.

Bridge BTC

Decentralized BTC Bridges

Bridges that replace a single custodian with threshold signatures, DLC escrow or collateralized vaults. Trust shifts to a protocol and its operators, not one company.

dlcBTC logo

Bridge dlcBTC

DLC.Link · DLC escrow Decentralized

dlcBTC locks BTC in DLC-based Bitcoin escrow, with attestors enabling minting on Arbitrum and Ethereum. It is active but has narrower liquidity and integrations than larger custodial wrappers, so route availability needs checking. Use it when that DLC custody model fits the job and the supported chain is clear before signing.

Bridge BTC
iBTC·DLC logo

Bridge iBTC·DLC

DLC.Link · DLC multisig Decentralized

iBTC Network represents BTC through 2-of-2 Bitcoin multisig and DLC-based mint and burn flows. It spans iBTC Network and Ethereum, but users should verify current chain support before moving funds.

Bridge BTC
interBTC logo

Bridge interBTC

Interlay · Vault collateral Decentralized

interBTC uses Interlay's collateralized vault model: BTC is locked by permissionless vaults that post collateral and support redemption. It can touch Polkadot, Kusama, Ethereum and Moonbeam, but the route is harder because ticker overlap, vault conditions and chain support require care. Check the exact asset before you bridge BTC there.

Bridge BTC
pBTC logo

Bridge pBTC

pNetwork · Uncertain Verify status

pBTC relied on pNetwork bridge vaults and validator-controlled mint/burn processes across Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain and EOS. Its current status is uncertain, so verify redemption paths directly before treating it as usable.

Verify status

BTC L2 & Sidechain-Native Bitcoin

Sidechain and layer assets where BTC is pegged into a separate chain rather than wrapped as an ERC-20. The peg, not a custodian contract, defines how you exit back to L1.

RBTC logo

Bridge RBTC

Rootstock · PowPeg Sidechain

RBTC is Rootstock's sidechain BTC asset, backed through the PowPeg rather than an ERC-20 wrapped Bitcoin issuer. Peg operations depend on Rootstock bridge consensus and PowHSM controls, so it belongs in the sidechain category.

Bridge BTC

Bridge L-BTC

Liquid · Federation Sidechain

L-BTC is Liquid Network's federated sidechain Bitcoin representation. The Liquid Federation manages the peg, and public users may need federation members or supported services for peg-out. It is active, but redemption access differs from a normal exchange withdrawal and should be checked before routing, including member access and wallet compatibility.

Bridge BTC

BTCFi Liquid-Staking BTC

Bitcoin routed through Babylon-linked staking and issued as a liquid token. These are protocol products with staking and redemption mechanics layered on top of the BTC representation — not plain wrapped BTC.

SolvBTC logo

Bridge SolvBTC

Solv · Reserve asset LST

SolvBTC is Solv Protocol's onchain Bitcoin reserve asset across Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum, Base and Merlin.

Bridge BTC
xSolvBTC logo

Bridge xSolvBTC

Solv · BTCFi LST LST

xSolvBTC is a yield-bearing Solv BTC variant tied to Babylon ecosystem staking and Solv reserve architecture. It can appear on Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum and Base, but it is not the same risk profile as plain wrapped Bitcoin. Treat the staking layer as part of the route decision too.

Bridge BTC
pumpBTC logo

Bridge pumpBTC

PumpBTC · Babylon LST LST

pumpBTC routes wrapped BTC assets through PumpBTC partners and Babylon staking to issue liquid tokens. It is active on Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain and Mantle, with protocol and custody-partner execution risk.

Bridge BTC
uniBTC logo

Bridge uniBTC

Bedrock · Restaking LST LST

Bedrock uniBTC starts from supported wrapped BTC deposits, then adds staking or restaking exposure managed by Bedrock.

Bridge BTC
stBTC logo

Bridge stBTC

Lorenzo · Staking agent LST

Lorenzo stBTC is a Babylon staking principal token issued after qualified staking agents receive BTC and provide proof. It appears on Lorenzo Chain, Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain, and settlement depends on the staking-agent process.

Bridge BTC
M-BTC logo

Bridge M-BTC

Merlin · Uncertain Verify status

M-BTC is a Merlin Chain mapped BTC representation or asset voucher from Merlin staking and bridge flows. Its current bridge and redemption status is uncertain, so verify official support before using it.

Verify status

Aave BTC (aWBTC) — lending receipt, not a bridge

Included because people search “Aave BTC”: aWBTC is the receipt you get for supplying WBTC to Aave. It is a claim on pool-supplied WBTC, not a way to bridge native Bitcoin.

aWBTC logo

aWBTC

Aave · Lending receipt Not a bridge

aWBTC is Aave's lending receipt for supplied WBTC on markets such as Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism and Base. It is not a BTC bridge, not a native BTC asset and not a wrapped-BTC issuer. Treat it as a claim on pool-supplied WBTC inside Aave markets rather than native Bitcoin exposure.

Open Aave

Hard-to-Bridge Bitcoin (and how to route it)

Some BTC variants are harder to bridge because they depend on narrower liquidity, chain-specific wallets, protocol-managed staking, issuer redemption or current-status checks. Interlay is a useful example of how a BTC route can be active but still operationally different from a custodial wrapped token.

BTC variantWhy it’s harder to bridgeHow to route it
interBTCIt uses collateralized vaults and supports redemption through Interlay's model, so the route is more specialized than a simple exchange-issued wrapper.Verify the supported chain, vault/redemption route and ticker context because iBTC can refer to other assets.
dlcBTC / iBTCThe DLC-based model is narrower than major custodial wrappers and depends on the relevant DLC.Link or iBTC Network flow.Confirm whether your destination chain supports the exact asset and whether the route uses dlcBTC or the newer iBTC branding.
xSolvBTCIt is a yield-bearing SolvBTC variant tied to Solv's reserve architecture and Babylon ecosystem staking exposure.Treat it as BTCFi, not plain wrapped BTC, and check redemption, supported chains and protocol terms before moving funds.
stBTCLorenzo's stBTC involves qualified staking agents, staking proof and principal-token accounting rather than a basic wrapped BTC mint.Check Lorenzo Chain, Ethereum or BNB Smart Chain support and understand the staking-agent process before routing.
pumpBTCpumpBTC routes wrapped BTC assets through partners and Babylon-focused liquid-staking mechanics.Verify partner custody, supported networks and redemption mechanics directly from PumpBTC documentation.
uniBTCBedrock accepts supported wrapped BTC and adds staking or restaking exposure, so it carries protocol-layer mechanics beyond bridging.Use Bedrock's supported asset list and chain support before assuming a direct native-BTC bridge path.
pBTC / M-BTCBoth have uncertain current bridge or redemption status in the factpack and should not be treated as standard active routes.Verify the current pNetwork or Merlin documentation, supported chains and redemption availability before any use.

Legacy & deprecated BTC bridges

Legacy BTC wrappers can remain visible in wallets, DEX pairs and search results after their practical bridge routes have changed. Use current issuer or protocol documentation, and treat the old Ren client docs as historical context for RenBridge and RenVM.

renBTC

renBTC was the RenVM-era BTC asset, but Ren 1.0 was sunset after the Alameda/FTX collapse. Do not use RenBridge as a live BTC-to-renBTC bridge; start from the Ren client docs only for historical context.

HBTC

HBTC is a legacy Huobi/HTX-era BTC wrapper on Ethereum with weak current reserve and redemption assurances in the factpack. Treat the Huobi BTC listing as an identity reference, not a route recommendation.

imBTC

imBTC is a Tokenlon-issued ERC-777 BTC representation and should be framed as legacy, not as a current bridge path. The imBTC FAQ is useful for definition and history.

Fees, custody and security

Bridge cost and risk come from components, not a single universal quote. Compare the fee stack, custody model and redemption path before choosing a wrapped Bitcoin route.

Fees

Expect a Bitcoin miner fee, a bridge or protocol fee where applicable, destination-chain gas and any redemption or withdrawal cost. Those components can change with network conditions and with the issuer or protocol route.

Custody

Who controls the underlying BTC differs by model: BitGo/WBTC-style custodians, Coinbase account-linked custody, Binance-pegged reserves, federated sidechains, threshold signing groups, DLC escrow, signer sets and collateralized vaults. The Wrapped Bitcoin site is the main factpack source for the custodial WBTC model.

Risks

Wrapped and bridged BTC can face peg-stability pressure, bridge or contract exposure, liquidity gaps and redemption limits. BTCFi liquid-staking tokens add protocol-managed staking and reward-accounting mechanics, so review sources such as Babylon liquid staking tokens before treating them like plain BTC wrappers.

Bridging is irreversible once settled; verify chain, contract and issuer before confirming.

Bridge BTC FAQ

Does RenBridge still bridge BTC to renBTC?

No, RenBridge should be treated as historical because RenVM and renBTC are deprecated after the Ren 1.0 sunset. The old Ren client docs remain useful for understanding how the original system worked, but this page should not imply that RenBridge currently mints BTC into renBTC. Use RenBridge as a reference hub for wrapped Bitcoin options, and treat any remaining renBTC exposure with caution. Source: Ren client docs.

Is aWBTC a BTC bridge?

No, aWBTC is an Aave lending receipt for supplied WBTC, not a BTC bridge or a wrapped-BTC issuer. When WBTC is supplied into Aave, the protocol mints an aToken receipt that represents a claim on pool-supplied WBTC. That means the underlying asset is already WBTC, with its own issuer and custody model, before Aave accounting begins. For the receipt-token model, see Aave Tokenization.

What is wrapped Bitcoin?

Wrapped Bitcoin is a tokenized representation of BTC value on another chain, not native BTC on Bitcoin L1. A wrapper or bridge usually depends on a custody, peg or mint-and-burn process, so the token should be evaluated by issuer, chain, contract and redemption path. WBTC is the canonical example on Ethereum and other EVM networks, with mint and burn coordinated through its ecosystem. See WBTC for the issuer-side framing.

What happens when I bridge BTC?

A BTC bridge usually locks or custodies native BTC, then mints a representation on the destination chain. The exact mechanics depend on the route: WBTC uses custodians and merchants, tBTC uses Threshold Network operator groups, and sidechains such as Liquid or Rootstock use their own peg systems. The important check is who controls the BTC and how redemption works. For a threshold-cryptography bridge model, review Threshold tBTC docs.

How do I get back to native BTC?

You normally redeem, burn or withdraw the wrapped asset through its issuer or bridge route, then wait for processing and Bitcoin settlement. The path is asset-specific: WBTC redemption depends on the WBTC ecosystem, Liquid peg-outs involve Liquid Federation mechanics, and Rootstock uses its PowPeg sidechain model. Before sending funds, verify the token contract, destination chain and supported redemption route. For a sidechain peg example, see Liquid Technical Overview.

Why are some BTC bridge routes harder than others?

Some BTC routes are harder because liquidity, chain support, wallets or redemption access can be limited. interBTC uses collateralized vaults, DLC-based BTC variants rely on more specialized flows, and BTCFi assets can add staking or protocol-managed redemption assumptions. Deprecated or uncertain assets need extra verification before any route is considered. For the collateralized-vault model behind interBTC, see Interlay.

Are BTCFi liquid-staking tokens the same as wrapped BTC?

No, BTCFi liquid-staking tokens are a different category from plain wrapped BTC because they can add staking mechanics, protocol roles and redemption rules. Assets such as LBTC, SolvBTC, pumpBTC, uniBTC and stBTC may represent Bitcoin exposure, but their risk profile includes the staking or BTCFi system on top of the underlying BTC representation. Treat them as protocol-specific products, not generic bridge BTC. For that category context, see Babylon liquid staking tokens.